not enough to make trees and schemes of knowledge:

     For at the heart of the Ramist enterprise is the drive to tie 
     down words themselves, rather than other 
     representations, in simple geometrical patterns. Words 
     are believed to be recalcitrant insofar as they derive from 
     a world of sound, voices, cries; the Ramist ambition is to 
     neutralize this connection by processing what is of itself 
     nonspatial in order to reduce it to space in the starkest 
     way possible. The spatial processing of sound by means 
     of the alphabet is not enough. Printed or written words 
     themselves must be deployed in spatial relationships, and 
     the resulting schemata thought of as a key to their 
     meanings. (pp. 89­90)

     Confronted with the numerous relationships between